capri:concept:refrun
                Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| capri:concept:refrun [2011/04/11 08:31] – created 131.220.212.14 | capri:concept:refrun [2022/11/07 10:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <TABLE padding=" | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | with CAPRI. It reflects the most probable development in agricultural markets | ||
| + | |||
| + | from global to regional scale for 8-10 year time horizon, at the current legislation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It integrates agricultural market projections from other institutions as OECD, FAPRI, FAO and DG-AGRI. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unique for CAPRI is the regional resolution below the national level for EU27 at the level of | ||
| + | |||
| + | NUTS 2 regions and farm types inside NUTS 2 region, and the Bayesian methodology applied.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | are calibrated to results of the reference run.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <P> | ||
| + | In opposite to many other reference run approaches, CAPRI employs a Bayesian estimation | ||
| + | |||
| + | framework to define a mutually consistent set of projection values for activity levels, | ||
| + | |||
| + | yields, production, feed and processing demand, human consumption, | ||
| + | |||
| + | all major equations from the supply and market modules are defined as in an optimization | ||
| + | |||
| + | framework which maximizes the joint posterior density for given a priori distribution | ||
| + | |||
| + | of the different elements. The a priori distribution is wherever possible derived to from exogenous forecasts or expert information.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </TD> | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | </TD> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </TR> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <TABLE padding=" | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | </TD> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <TD> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | long term trends are projected. Using "no change" | ||
| + | |||
| + | between the base year value and the trend estimate is calculated, using R squared | ||
| + | |||
| + | as weight for the trend estimate. The | ||
| + | |||
| + | resulting estimates along with the estimation error of the trend deliver a priori distributions | ||
| + | |||
| + | for all items in the estimation framework.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <P>In a first step, the estimation is solved for these trend support, indepedently for each country. Afterwards, results are aggregated to | ||
| + | |||
| + | EU. The projections of other instutions are then added, and replace where available the supports based on trends. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the projections are only reporting values for the EU and not for individual countries, | ||
| + | |||
| + | the country results from the first steps are used to distributed the EU estimate. The standard errors for the there projections, | ||
| + | |||
| + | especially for those provided by DG-AGRI, is set rather narrow, ensuring that the values are recovered as long as they do not violate | ||
| + | |||
| + | the consistency restrictions.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | down in a similar framework to NUTS 2 level, and from there to farm type groups.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </TD> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </TR> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | system. In order to ease the validation, results of the reference run are accessible via the Graphical User Interface, where several reporting tables aggregate over activities, commodities and countries. | ||
| + | |||
| + | With the help of the GUI, analysts can compare systematically the subsequent steps of the baseline procedure.</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | run exercise for the OECD/FAO AGLINK-COSIMO model with an estimated input of 20 person months and the CAPRI reference run | ||
| + | |||
| + | with an estimated inputs of about 2 person months is reported by <A HREF=http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | The CAPRI baseline is regularly calibrated to the mid-term commodity outlook of the European Commission. More on the technical and institutional aspects can be found in the following JRC reports: <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
| + |  | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + |  | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | <P class=" | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <font size=1> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
